That this may have replaced the the bobbin set up - assume they wouldn't have changed it unless they thought it was an improvement.
Get it?
2003 MG ZT 260 SE #038
1993 MG RV8
1975 MGB Roadster
Steve, I think the bobbins are obscured by the aspect view.
I used to be indecisive but now I'm not so sure.
When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth
2004 MG ZT 260SE Pearl Black
1960 MGA Roadster Flame Red
I'm only suggesting as a possibility they may have changed the rear mountings after #732 after David's remark that there may have been a design change.
Maybe they utilised the XJ8 rear gear box mountings like the front engine mounts which are a derivative of the XJ8.
Pic from the 260 workshop manual and of the xj8 gearbox mount.
2003 MG ZT 260 SE #038
1993 MG RV8
1975 MGB Roadster
Possible of course, Steve, but the change at #732 as indicated by the German site, if indeed that is fact, still indicates the need for two rubber mountings and the price is the same as prior to #732. That would be unlikely to be so were the change related to an XJ type mount, as you suggest could be the case.
(P.S. Removed your dupe post, Steve).
David
Last edited by David; 24-12-2021 at 12:04 PM.
I'm still looking!! ....... I wonder if they used the BMW gearbox rubbers as they look very similar. Will get it up on the ramps at my local garage - the notch and peg should be a give away - possibly.
4R75W
2003 MG ZT 260 SE #038
1993 MG RV8
1975 MGB Roadster
Just to update:-
I got the car up on the ramps of my local garage and got a lot better look at the rubbers and came to the conclusion with the garage owner (who is an american classic car enthusiast) that the rubbers were fine.
If not I would have bought the cheaper bobbin rubbers to fit before buying the £50 ones.
2003 MG ZT 260 SE #038
1993 MG RV8
1975 MGB Roadster