Non SE vs SE performance - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28

Thread: Non SE vs SE performance

  1. #11
    Registered User pessling's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    west drayton, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    4,813

    Default

    Just get a an SE with an accufab and that difference will be nothing if not the other way round.
    Peter Essling


  2. #12
    ********** obiwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    573

    Default

    This doesn't really address the SE Vs non SE question but I came across the attached in the mechanics manual.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Ben Palmer
    Perth, Western Australia
    #779

  3. #13
    Ex-Admin, RIP Herman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Swindon, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    7,132

    Default

    Apparently you can do a driver performance slimming course.
    0.05 secs for every stone you loose

    Just enjoy the car
    Fear keeps you alive. Fearless gets you killed

    Herman

    Vin#076 pics, Black, modified and with 234 RWHP and 276 lb/ft (275 BHP and 440 Nm @ flywheel)

    FJ1200, DynoJet Stage 1, K&N filter

    Alfa MiTo 1.4 Cloverleaf, 170 BHP, Alfa Rosso.

  4. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Donegal
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by obiwan View Post
    This doesn't really address the SE Vs non SE question but I came across the attached in the mechanics manual.
    50-70 in 4th in 5.9 surely a mistake? my diesel ZT takes that long to do
    50-70 in 5th,if this is a true figure how long does it take to do 50-70 in 5th?

  5. #15
    Registered User Ajay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Reading, United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,281

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rolled1 View Post
    50-70 in 4th in 5.9 surely a mistake? my diesel ZT takes that long to do
    50-70 in 5th,if this is a true figure how long does it take to do 50-70 in 5th?
    Your diesel ZT can get from 50 to 70 in 5th quicker than it can do it in 4th
    Me thinks you've either something wrong with your car or it ain't a standard ZT oil burner.

    50-70 mph in 4th: ZT CDTi = 8.0 sec; ZT 131 CDTi = 6.8 sec; ZT 260 = 5.5 sec.
    Andrew Flewin



    ZT260SE #269



    The mind is like a parachute, it only functions when open.

  6. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Donegal
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ajay View Post
    Your diesel ZT can get from 50 to 70 in 5th quicker than it can do it in 4th
    Me thinks you've either something wrong with your car or it ain't a standard ZT oil burner.

    50-70 mph in 4th: ZT CDTi = 8.0 sec; ZT 131 CDTi = 6.8 sec; ZT 260 = 5.5 sec.
    Ah...I didnt mention it doing 50-70 quicker in 5th than 4th,BUT it does 50 -70 in 5th as stated in 6secs, 50-70 in 4th is slightly quicker,the fact the diesel doesnt rev very high doesnt help in 4th,over 60 in 4th its just screaming to be changed up,nothing really special about mine,like most diesel ZT owners who read the forums you soon realise a few cheap mods release a lot more power,bigger air intake,egr bypass,better air filter and best of all roverrons tuning box,only 150-160bhp but almost as much torque as the 260 and 45mpg easy,still want a 260 though,just for the noise

  7. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Garvagh. Coleraine, Northern Ireland
    Posts
    9,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rolled1 View Post
    still want a 260 though,just for the noise
    Easy - get one of these https://www.two-sixties.co.uk/mgoc26...ead.php?t=5781
    Colin Ellis #456 It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end

  8. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Donegal
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ragman View Post
    ????????????? cant get access to that

  9. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Garvagh. Coleraine, Northern Ireland
    Posts
    9,113
    Colin Ellis #456 It'll be alright in the end. If it's not alright, it's not the end

  10. #20
    #264
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sheffield
    Posts
    477

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keith View Post
    So that begs the question what if I strip the car down to a bare shell and drivers seat?

    Just how much weight could be removed?
    what would that do to the 0-60 times and for that matter the MPG?
    I've always liked the idea of that keith - a stipped out street racer. I'd do it if she didn't moan, but i just know she would.
    Surely it would improve the mpg as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •