In pretty rough condition!
See ... https://www.facebook.com/groups/1414...3996440821707/
Printable View
In pretty rough condition!
See ... https://www.facebook.com/groups/1414...3996440821707/
Without being a member of that group you can see nothing, so do you have any more information please? Is it advertised elsewhere, or on Facebook Marketplace, maybe?Quote:
Originally Posted by steve00136
David
It's in Plymouth, has lots of defects and needs lots of money spent on it. Doesn't start as immobiliser problem, abs light on
No headliner, no mot
XPG with a body kit but needs painting again as probably done with a rattle can £7500
Thanks, Jeff. Found it on the FB Marketplace, eventually. VIN #055 by the look of it. Now in the Complete list here:Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff turbo
https://www.two-sixties.co.uk/mgoc26...304#post188304
David
MOT not renewed this year. Not tested between 2016 and 2020. Passed in September 2020 after failing in August for the following;
Repair immediately (major defects):
- Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
- Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.1.2 (h))
- Front Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
- Exhaust carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds default limits (8.2.1.2 (b))
- Nearside Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
- Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
- Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength inner sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Monitor and repair if necessary (advisories):
- Front side lights flickering
- Nearside Side repeater slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
- Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
- Oil leak, but not excessive Rear diff (8.4.1 (a) (i))
- General underbody corrosion
What are defects and advisories?
The MOT test changed on 20 May 2018
Defects are now categorised according to their severity ? dangerous, major, and minor. Find out more
Date tested14 July 2016
PASS
Mileage56,203 miles
MOT test number2296 4033 4771
Test location
View test location
Expiry date13 July 2017
Date tested9 July 2015
PASS
Mileage54,745 miles
MOT test number9197 8049 5121
Test location
View test location
Expiry date8 July 2016
Date tested10 December 2013
PASS
Mileage49,996 miles
MOT test number9268 6454 3304
Test location
View test location
Expiry date18 December 2014
Advisory notice item(s)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
What are advisories?
Date tested19 December 2012
PASS
Mileage46,520 miles
MOT test number7678 5485 2358
Test location
View test location
Expiry date18 December 2013
Date tested13 December 2012
FAIL
Mileage46,495 miles
MOT test number2986 0814 2343
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
- Nearside Rear Upper coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
- Offside Rear Upper coil spring incomplete (2.4.C.1a)
What are failures?
Date tested21 November 2011
PASS
Mileage40,042 miles
MOT test number3069 5582 1333
Test location
View test location
Expiry date20 November 2012
Advisory notice item(s)
- Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
What are advisories?
Date tested15 November 2010
FAIL
Mileage29,644 miles
MOT test number2748 1981 0378
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
- Nearside Front Lower Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting insecure (2.4.G.1)
- Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low and too far to the right. (1.8)
Advisory notice item(s)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
What are failures and advisories?
Date tested15 November 2010
PASS
Mileage29,644 miles
MOT test number1735 2901 0350
Test location
View test location
Expiry date14 November 2011
Advisory notice item(s)
- Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
- Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
What are advisories?
Date tested12 November 2009
PASS
Mileage25,296 miles
MOT test number5414 4631 9337
Test location
View test location
Expiry date11 November 2010
Advisory notice item(s)
- Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
What are advisories?
Date tested29 October 2008
PASS
Mileage21,600 miles
MOT test number5039 1370 8389
Test location
View test location
Expiry date28 October 2009
Date tested28 October 2008
FAIL
Mileage21,600 miles
MOT test number6832 4270 8305
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
- Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
- Offside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
- Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
- Nearside Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
- Offside Front brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
What are failures?
Date tested15 March 2007
PASS
Mileage17,148 miles
MOT test number5742 4407 7053
Test location
View test location
Expiry date14 March 2008
Outstanding vehicle recalls
Check if MG ZT YR04HGF has outstanding recalls
Support links
- Cookies
- Terms and conditions
- Privacy notice
- Accessibility statement
- MOT history API
- Built by the Driver & Vehicle Standards Agency
Open Government Licence
All content is available under the Open Government Licence v3.0, except where otherwise stated
Even more work needed then, I would put that at about £2-2500 as a fair price, I cannot believe he will get £7500 for it based on what I bought 277 for
Two-Sixties Gallery photos from 2016. Unsure of any insurance write-off Category it may still carry. No mention in the FB Marketplace ad.
Attachment 15209 Attachment 15210 Attachment 15211
David
Worth even less then lol
Lots of time and cash needed to bring it somewhere near to acceptable,probably worth more in parts.missing headliner is a big ask,which after my troubles even finding the correct cloth was impossible,good luck to who ever takes the gamble hope they have deep pockets.
Bob Burgess lives around the corner from this car.