PDA

View Full Version : MG 4.6 V8 Prototype 2002



AndyG
18-02-2013, 03:31 AM
MG 4.6 V8 Prototype 2002/2003? VIN #003?


http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/rover/other-models/rover-4-6-v8-prototype-2002/1089304

4615

bernard lpg
18-02-2013, 10:16 AM
Specification all wrong. 4 cylinders in line, front wheel drive etc etc.

Nich
18-02-2013, 10:23 AM
That's a really interesting Spec..................


Description 2003 MG V8 4.6 Prototype
Number 3, 18,000 miles, original alloys with car
Specification

Engine layout: Front Engined
Aspiration: Normally Aspirated
Engine size (Litres): 4.6
Engine configuration: 4 cylinder
Cylinder layout: Inline
Cylinders: 4
Engine power (BHP): 341
Torque (lbs/ft): 738
Driven wheels: Front Wheel Drive
Previous owners: 3

The detail



Mileage: 18,000
Year: 2002
Doors: 3
Body type: Saloon
Transmission type: Manual
Fuel type: Petrol
Colour: Red

peterv8
18-02-2013, 10:27 AM
They got the colour right though!:-D

MrDoodles
18-02-2013, 11:42 AM
I didn't think that the early prototypes had ATC, or am I thinking of something else? :confused:

Nich
18-02-2013, 11:49 AM
I didn't think that the early prototypes had ATC, or am I thinking of something else? :confused:

Probably, but I think that's the least of the problems.......

Nich.

Dominic22
18-02-2013, 11:58 AM
more photos here http://www.allsportscars.co.uk/shopexd.asp?id=945

Bainzi
18-02-2013, 12:09 PM
Was`nt 003 David Watts car? We bumped into him one year at Reading services as we met to go to Brooklands

colintf
18-02-2013, 12:10 PM
that does look like David's car (#003) and thats where I think he bought it from.

But why would anyone by that, knowing that David had many problems with it that not even AE WIlcox could fix (due to prototype electronics) when you could have Brians supercharged car or could of had Gaz's ZT320 for a similar price??? :cool:

eurorover
18-02-2013, 12:48 PM
007 has ATC

tonybubble
18-02-2013, 01:39 PM
Probably, but I think that's the least of the problems.......

Nich.

Do we really need to 'rubbish' our own cars in a public forum??!! :(

Nich
18-02-2013, 03:09 PM
I think you have misunderstood my post Tony. The specification in the advert (see post #3) doesn't make any sense and is very misleading, hence my reference to the least of the problems being whether it has ATC.

I don't think anyone is trying to 'rubbish' our cars, the seller of this one seems to be doing this quite well himself.

Nich.